2/11/2008

Guest Post: Too Many Books


The following post on the avalanche of books reviewers receive comes to us from long-time NBCC member Alan Caruba.

I have been reviewing books since the 1960s and am a founding member of the National Book Critics Circle. For years I have also been a judge for the Publishers Marketing Association’s Benjamin Franklin Awards.

There are too many books being published.

I know that may sound like apostasy, but you don’t get an average of 150 books a month. I do.

I can pretty much judge a book by its cover. This is particularly true of the insane deluge of self-published books from pay-to-print operations like iUniverse, Xlibris, and Author House, to name a few. As far as I can tell, a number of authors create their own publishing firm to put out their books. The truth is that a handful of such books in any year are quite good, but I doubt that any reviewer has the time to sift through the deluge to find the pearl.

There is a reason why reviewers tend to favor the mainline publishers, large and small. They do it to pay their employees and, ultimately, to generate a profit. They mostly manage to do so successfully enough to cover the losses from the books that become “remainders”, an odd name for books that just do not sell.

I personally think it is obscene to give some celebrity an advance of millions of dollars and I take a certain pleasure when their books fail in the marketplace.

Truth is, I cannot give the tons of books I receive to local libraries. I stopped doing that long ago when I discovered they really didn’t want them any more than myself. Even a library has a finite amount of space on its shelves. Instead I give as many as possible away to anyone who loves to read, usually folks where I reside.

The reason I say there are too many books being published is that, from experience, I can tell you that, after a while, one concludes that the world does not need another cookbook, another diet book, another garden book, another get-rich-quick book, another how to manage your corporate team book, another book about dogs or cats? How many travel books about Hawaii or any other place on Earth are needed?

I cannot tell you how many World War II, Korean, Vietnam and now Iraq War books I receive every year. This is true also for books about the Holocaust. These events were momentous and tragic, but why must we read every book by everyone who participated or survived them?

Memoirs by people nobody ever heard about are a mystery to me. Biographies of equally obscure people baffle me.

Then there are the novels. I am convinced that the current generation of retirees, tired of playing golf or some other pastime, have decided to sit down at their computer and write that great novel they have had running around in their head for years. And it’s not just retirees. It’s everyone who can belly up to the keyboard.

There is no way to describe the volume of novels being published these days. I received one today by an author who has written “over sixty thriller and supernatural novels.” It defies logic that anyone could produce anything of merit in that quantity. Even the best American novelists such as Steinbeck and Hemingway ran out of ideas and energy, writing some stinkers to pay the rent.

Every month, over at Bookviews.com, I post a report about new books. It averages about 70 titles, fiction and non-fiction. That’s nearly 850 books a year and I guarantee you they are the best of the lot of the approximately 1,800 I receive.

I recommend you visit. It will astound you.

--Alan Caruba's weekly commentaries are posted on the website of The National Anxiety Center and are widely disseminated on the Internet. He also has a daily blog called Warning Signs. Love to read? Visit his monthly report on the best in new fiction and non-fiction at Bookviews.com.

Labels:

4 Comments:

Anonymous Honenberger said...

What is new novelist to do? How do I justify calling attention to my novel when there are others more worthy and lots that shouldn't even be in print? The answer lies in the awards, the reviewers, the folks like you who take the time to sort through the myriad newcomers and express an opinion, with supporting reasons. Your reputation gives your opinion weight in the same way that my awards and my readers' loyalty and enthusiasm gives my reputation as an author weight. I give thanks for reviewers and book clubs and readers in general who feel strongly enough about a book to talk it up and spread the word. Someday maybe I'll write a prize winner. For now, being nominated with my first novel was a thrill that will last for a long time. And I thank this site for linking to mine, www.readwhitelies.com. Discernment and education are the hope of all authors.

10:08 PM  
Blogger Rose Fox said...

This post really rubs me the wrong way. The problem is not an excess of books. The problem is, as you note rather further down, an excess of books that tread too-familiar ground. If each of those 150 books were unique and brilliant, you might say there are too many for you to read--though if you're including cookbooks and travel guides, I imagine you weren't expecting to sit down and page through them as though they were novels or biographies--but that's a problem with the human reading speed and capacity for comprehending new information, not a problem with publishing or the general reading populace. Are you really suggesting that the publishing world as a whole should limit its annual output to what you, personally, can reasonably consume in a year? Maybe we should limit them to half a book a year, since I think that's about what the average American adult consumes.

Your last paragraph makes this whole bit of commentary sound like a lead-in to an ad for the site where you write. "Tired of being overwhelmed by too many books? That's what I'm here for!" That's not news, though, nor is it specific to you; it's what all reviewers are here for. Were there not "too many" books, academic criticism might survive but the only use of reviews would be to decide in what order to read this year's scant selections.

By focusing on quantity, you obscure the real issue of quality, and by simultaneously complaining about the inadequacy of your own capacity for book-processing and suggesting that your world-weary advice is the hapless reader's only guide through the maze of shelves, you do publishers, readers, and your fellow reviewers a disservice.

1:41 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How awful, not having had to ever buy any books since the '60s.
What do you do with all this detritus? Send them to me and I will flog them on Ebay for you for a consideration.

2:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're right, Alan. Too damn many books are published! And too damn many of them lack quality editing.

11:24 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home